On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Renato Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like > opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages? > > I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't > anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD. > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100 > Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without >> > change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name >> > opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version >> > 2.0.0). >> > >> > If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the >> > package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful. >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > Renato Garcia >> > >> >> Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. >> Be patient, it will be updated soon :) >> >> Best Regards, >> Laszlo Papp >
See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
