What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?
I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD. On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100 Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without > > change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name > > opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version > > 2.0.0). > > > > If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the > > package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful. > > > > Regards > > > > Renato Garcia > > > > Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. > Be patient, it will be updated soon :) > > Best Regards, > Laszlo Papp
