oops ... I just hit reply since I thought your nessage to me about not
sending to two places was also itself not sent to two places. Sorry about
that.

Bob

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:29 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> okey dokey !!
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:04 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > So, yeah, now is the time for Aaron to consider such an approach. And
>> >> > IMHO
>> >> > it is something to consider BEFORE asking us to consider the current
>> >> > proposal from Allan/Lou. HECK , I can't even get Aaron to ask me for
>> >> > money I
>> >> > said I would donate.
>> >>
>> >> Why does the decision for ArchLinux to become a non-profit have ANY
>> >> bearing whatsoever on this proposal? It seems we're getting a little
>> >> cracked here. Let's all take a step back and look at what we're
>> >> talking about here, please
>> >>
>> >> I have more important things to do. If anyone has any serious
>> >> questions regarding actual facts, feel free to email me personally.
>> >> These mailing list posts are getting way out of hand, and frankly I
>> >> just don't care anymore.
>> >
>> > It has EVERYTHING to do with the current proposal, Why ? Well because
>> you
>> > are having resource concerns and said you spent a bunch of money beefing
>> > them up. Now you were looking at code and other things that might be
>> done.
>> > Further YOU did say that efficiency was at issue, and that is ALWAYS a
>> > trade-off with resources, time and money.
>> >
>> > So yeah, this proposal is based on needs, and those needs are based on
>> > resources. And you NEED funding to continue to grow. Period.
>> >
>> > I am sorry if you feel that Arch linux can continue to grow with what
>> > amounts to funding from your income and time form your day. It cannot.
>>
>> Please do not send mail to me and the list. I get list mails already.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to