On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:04 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > So, yeah, now is the time for Aaron to consider such an approach. And >> > IMHO >> > it is something to consider BEFORE asking us to consider the current >> > proposal from Allan/Lou. HECK , I can't even get Aaron to ask me for >> > money I >> > said I would donate. >> >> Why does the decision for ArchLinux to become a non-profit have ANY >> bearing whatsoever on this proposal? It seems we're getting a little >> cracked here. Let's all take a step back and look at what we're >> talking about here, please >> >> I have more important things to do. If anyone has any serious >> questions regarding actual facts, feel free to email me personally. >> These mailing list posts are getting way out of hand, and frankly I >> just don't care anymore. > > It has EVERYTHING to do with the current proposal, Why ? Well because you > are having resource concerns and said you spent a bunch of money beefing > them up. Now you were looking at code and other things that might be done. > Further YOU did say that efficiency was at issue, and that is ALWAYS a > trade-off with resources, time and money. > > So yeah, this proposal is based on needs, and those needs are based on > resources. And you NEED funding to continue to grow. Period. > > I am sorry if you feel that Arch linux can continue to grow with what > amounts to funding from your income and time form your day. It cannot.
Please do not send mail to me and the list. I get list mails already.
