On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly > and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the > previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person > who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or > otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files, > making the current use of Maintainer redundant. > > I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have > an opinion on that? >
+1 Hm, this is quite a "me too" post :) -- Anders Bergh
