>-----Original Message----- >Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:25:23 +0200 >Subject: Re: [aur-general] Where to put your name when you adopt an AUR package (was: TU Application) >From: "Daenyth Blank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <[email protected]> > >Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly >and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the >previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person >who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or >otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files, >making the current use of Maintainer redundant. > >I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have >an opinion on that?
I think this is about the same as Callan said, and I gave him a 1+, which mees that I agree. Regards Stefan
