My agreement with Aristotle's point, and from what I could tell (though obviously I can't speak for Aristotle) Aristotle's reasoning for the follow-up was to help clarify the direction and purpose of how this work should be viewed and where the focus should be placed. But either way, I 100% agree with his statement (as do we all! :) and wonder if this should be clearly marked and noted in a centralized wiki somewhere (Creative Commons, W3C) as the primary focus of the work done is this area? I would happily host one, but hosting a wiki isn't the problem. Finding the right place to host it is.
Any suggestions?
On 6/8/06, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 06-06-08 à 19:40, A. Pagaltzis a écrit :
> * Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-08 04:30]:
>> Which will not remove abuse :)
>
> Well, will anything short of not publishing your content?
>
> I think the point of such an effort is to make life easier for
> third parties who want to respect your wishes, not to make it
> harder for third parties who are intent on violating them.
Agreed. And it's why my message (which was really badly written -
fatigue) was separating the issue. It's a very important issue, and I
really believe a clear spec, framework or let's say technical
solution would improve the field. Definitely.
I would love to see that happening as soon as possible. It's a mix
between social and technical issues. Finding interoperable solutions
would help to soften the social issues and frustrations.
so again +1 a thousand of times ;)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
--
<M:D/>
M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com/
