On 9/6/06 4:23 PM, "Karl Dubost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Feed composed with multiple sources with different licenses. > When a feed aggregator creates a feed from different sources > (feeds) with different licenses, what should be the license of the > resulting feed? > > feed (license ???) > entry (license A) from feed X > entry (license B) from feed Y > entry (license B) from feed Y > entry (license A) from feed X > entry (license C) from feed Z either no license element at the the feed level (since every entry has their own license), or maybe a license that refers to the collection (eg. you could expose a license for your Top 10 List without necessarily claiming any license for the 10 items in the list). Interesting to think what different licenses might entail though: you could deny breaking up your feed by no-deriv (which would only work to the limit of fair use, ie. I could still cherry pick the occasional entry, although the entry's license might still stop me). If someone were to publish their Top 10 List, you could disallow someone re-aggregating it as a Top 5 List, say. e.
