Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
I think his point is that for a commercial rollout (say, a VSP), IAX is not
practical for all clients right now. It's not strange to have a personal
preference that is technically better but not commercially viable. That's
not an insult, just how things are sometimes. Maybe if there were some ~$70
NAT router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc. devices that supported IAX, this'd
change.
Sorry what are you wanting the "NAT
router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc." devices to support about IAX
exactly? It does not require any mad packet mangling like SIP does.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
