I think his point is that for a commercial rollout (say, a VSP), IAX is not practical for all clients right now. It's not strange to have a personal preference that is technically better but not commercially viable. That's not an insult, just how things are sometimes. Maybe if there were some ~$70 NAT router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc. devices that supported IAX, this'd change.
-Michael -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 8:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/* On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 21:53 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: > Probably since there are so many SIP devices out there now and only a couple > IAX. In the future it is an awsome replacement. So you would rather drive a '70s pinto instead of a Bugatti because there are more 70's fire bomb pintos? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Riddell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/* > > > > --SNIP ALL-- > > IAX is no adequate replacement option for SIP either. > > --SNIP ALL-- > > > > What?! How on earth could you come to that conclusion?! -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
