On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:41:03 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fair enough, I saw that you'd written "tried every option" but a lot of people > don't actually mean that. :-)
:-) > > Lines are provided by NTT. The driver (wcfxo.o) has been > > built with "#define JAPAN" uncommented. Before the present 1.0 > > release, this has usually reduced false hangups. > > Hmm okay so it is a known bug then; Not sure whether it would have been considered a bug before. If you look in the wcfxo code, the JAPAN define seems to simply set some values differently, ie offhook-debounce or whatever it's called. > have you done any hunting around on the > bugtracker or bothered a bug marshall? I have put it on the bugtracker, but Mark has declared it resolved for technicality reasons I don't fully understand, which is not to say that I am criticising it. I was lucky enough to catch Mark on the chat and we talked about how to approach this. He told me that 1.0 was a snapshot of last Thursday's or Friday's CVS and that I should find out exactly when between 20 Aug and 1.0 this broke. So I will have a bit of testing to do over the next days. > possibly where I'd expect to sit and hang for a while I had hoped to use 1.0 for an upcoming customer deployment because I thought it was a decendent of RC2 and there was a feature freeze, but now that I know it's just a very recent CVS I am not so sure I can dive in head over heels, so I will use the CVS of May 1st which has proven to be rather stable and with no or few surprises. But I'll dedicate a machine or two to 1.0 testing. > > Fair enough. But then again, why not have an option that disables > > hangup detection until a call actually goes to voicemail and leave it > > disabled if it doesn't?! > > Becuase it's a workaround and doesn't actually address the problem? In your > case it might be a valid solution though; I wonder how hard it'd be to > actually hack in? Well, that's what I was wondering about. Workaround or not, if it makes a huge difference for customers who would otherwise shun Asterisk, then it shouldn't be too much of a religious concern. Besides, I was suggesting this as an *option* that would by default be disabled, so it wouldn't make any difference for those who have no false hangups. Anyway, we'll first have to find the culprit. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
