brian k. west wrote:
nasty. The higher rate (6.something kbps) sounds more reasonable. Using
30ms blocks, it is not so compatible with *, which is geared to 20ms
block processing. A lost packet causes a 30ms hole, so it tends to be
less tolerant of packet loss than something working in smaller blocks.
It sounds awful for anything but a single pure voice.
* can do 30ms codecs. iLBC is one such codec...
Sure it works. I didn't say it was incompatible. I said it was not so
compatible. Because it doesn't fit into *'s 20ms block view of the world
you end up with greater latency than you would with some other codecs.
Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
