On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:04 AM, George Joseph <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Belanger > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on >> > stability, performance and features ? >> > >> > Would you recommand extensions.lua as an easy/easier way to access >> > memcached, redis or equivalent ? >> > >> > Thoughs ? Comments ? >> > >> The lack of replies should give you your answer. Extensions AEL and >> LUA don't get much action these days, I'm sure there are a few people >> that use them but extensions.conf has way more code coverage from a >> testing POV. >> >> Your better off using AGI if you want to leverage redis or memcached. >> > Actually, I use Lua dialplans in several production systems. Some are used > in conjunction with traditional dialplans and some are the only source of > dialplans. They've always been rock solid. I actually find it easier to > configure even a moderately complex dialplan than the traditional dialplan > syntax. > Cool, you are in the minor on that one. My only caution about using them about be the lack of support if you had issues.
-- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: [email protected] | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
