On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Belanger <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on > > stability, performance and features ? > > > > Would you recommand extensions.lua as an easy/easier way to access > > memcached, redis or equivalent ? > > > > Thoughs ? Comments ? > > > The lack of replies should give you your answer. Extensions AEL and > LUA don't get much action these days, I'm sure there are a few people > that use them but extensions.conf has way more code coverage from a > testing POV. > > Your better off using AGI if you want to leverage redis or memcached. > > Actually, I use Lua dialplans in several production systems. Some are used in conjunction with traditional dialplans and some are the only source of dialplans. They've always been rock solid. I actually find it easier to configure even a moderately complex dialplan than the traditional dialplan syntax.
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
