On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 01:29:16PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Shaun Ruffell wrote: >> There is a patch for this attached on issue 18992 [1] that should work >> regardless of which distribution may have back ported the dev_name >> definition. It will apply cleanly to both 2.4 and the current trunk. >> For example, to apply it on top of 2.4.1.1: >> >> ]# svn co http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/dahdi/linux/tags/2.4.1.1 >> dahdi-linux-2.4.1.1 >> ]# cd dahdi-linux-2.4.1.1 >> ]# wget >> 'https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.phpfile_id=29097&type=bug' -O - | >> patch -p1 >> >> [1] https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18992 > > Will this be added to the AsteriskNow rpms at some point or do I need to > build my own?
I imagine this will result in a dahdi-linux 2.4.1.2 release here next week, which will then most likely get rolled into the AsteriskNow RPMS sometime after that. > > Also, does this mean that for RHEL-6 and its clones there is going to be an > issue? No. RHEL 6 is based on the 2.6.32 kernel and dev_name was first defined in the mainline in 2.6.26. So this particular issue will not affect RHEL-6. Cheers, Shaun -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
