On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 05:32:51PM +0200, bakko wrote:
this diff solve the problem:
--- include/dahdi/kernel.h 2010-08-19 20:03:25.000000000 +0200
+++ include/dahdi/kernel.h 2011-03-18 11:32:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -86,7 +86,9 @@
#endif
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,26)
-#define dev_name(dev) (dev)->bus_id
+#if RHEL_RELEASE_CODE < RHEL_RELEASE_VERSION(5,6)
+#define dev_name(dev) (dev)->bus_id
+#endif
#define dev_set_name(dev, format, ...) \
snprintf((dev)->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, format, ## __VA_ARGS__);
#endif
There is a patch for this attached on issue 18992 [1] that should work
regardless of which distribution may have back ported the dev_name
definition. It will apply cleanly to both 2.4 and the current trunk.
For example, to apply it on top of 2.4.1.1:
]# svn co http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/dahdi/linux/tags/2.4.1.1
dahdi-linux-2.4.1.1
]# cd dahdi-linux-2.4.1.1
]# wget 'https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.phpfile_id=29097&type=bug'
-O - | patch -p1
[1] https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18992
Will this be added to the AsteriskNow rpms at some point or do I need to
build my own?
Also, does this mean that for RHEL-6 and its clones there is going to be an
issue?
Regards,
--
Tom [email protected] Spamtrap address
[email protected]
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
