On 11/12/10 10:44 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Yes, this is a snapshot after about 24 hours since I cleared the counters.
>>> I see what you mean - how can I have 76 seconds of errors but no bumped
>>> error counters.  I ran again just now:
>>>
>>> r...@vigw3:/etc/asterisk# dahdi_maint -s 1
>>> Span 1:
>>>> FEC : 0:
>>>> CEC : 0:
>>>> CVC : 0:
>>>> EBC : 0:
>>>> BEC : 0:
>>>> PRBS: 0:
>>>> GES : 248:
>>>
>>> Here's to hoping that the error in error is the GES, and that actually I
>>> have no errors ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> j
>>>
>>
>> Could you paste a cat of /proc/dahdi/1 for me here?
>>
>
> Sure thing:
>
> r...@vigw3:/etc/asterisk# cat /proc/dahdi/1
> Span 1: TE4/0/1 "T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1" (MASTER) B8ZS/ESF
>

Jeff,
   Hmm, I was expecting to see timing slips here. It looks like the 
framer is reporting something through GES that isn't exported elsewhere. 
I'll need to dig around for a bit to find it. You aren't having any 
audio quality issues are you?

-- 
Russ Meyerriecks
Digium | Linux Kernel Developer

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to