On 11/11/10 5:44 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Russ Meyerriecks wrote: > >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Daniel Tryba wrote: >> >>> I am curious about the tool "dahdi_maint"... what do the various >>> acronyms stand for? >> Yea there seemed to be a bit of confusion here as well so I patched >> trunk with some more descriptive error counter labels :O) >> >>>> FEC : 0: >> Framing Errors >> >>>> CEC : 0: >> CRC Errors >> >>>> CVC : 0: >> Code Violations >> >>>> EBC : 0: >> E-Bit Counter >> >>>> BEC : 0: >>>> PRBS: 0: >> Both of these were removed due to stale code >> >>>> GES : 76: >> General Errored Seconds > > Nice! Perfect. > >> >> Was this output a snapshot of your current system. Do you really have >> zeroed counters everywhere, but 76 errored seconds? If so, I'll probably >> need to investigate. >> > > Yes, this is a snapshot after about 24 hours since I cleared the counters. > I see what you mean - how can I have 76 seconds of errors but no bumped > error counters. I ran again just now: > > r...@vigw3:/etc/asterisk# dahdi_maint -s 1 > Span 1: >> FEC : 0: >> CEC : 0: >> CVC : 0: >> EBC : 0: >> BEC : 0: >> PRBS: 0: >> GES : 248: > > Here's to hoping that the error in error is the GES, and that actually I > have no errors ;) > > Cheers, > > j >
Could you paste a cat of /proc/dahdi/1 for me here? -- Russ Meyerriecks Digium | Linux Kernel Developer -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
