> > > Again, how many calls were you able record using RAMdisk? Anywhere 300? > > As I stated before, this is going to be dependent on how you're > manipulating the calls and the gear you're running on. The nice thing > about your 'just broadcast the entire LAN to the recording solution' > is that the recording service just gets to throw away everything > that's not an audio channel, and it doesn't have to do squat to the > call. If it COULDN'T do a lot of recordings under these circumstances > it wouldn't be worth any money. > > I don't think I've pushed my solution past 90 simultaneous recordings > of MeetMe() mixing, with more than 100 AGI channels running, with > assorted ChanSpy() jobs. > > > Bookmark my post, so when you reach your RAMDisk limit, you can join the > big > > league. > > Anything I do as a scaling solution will be price versus performance. > So since we're talking about a commercial solution to replace > something that asterisk does, I'll have to find out what your > commercial solution costs per channel, and compare that against the > cost of cloning out an identical server. My solution scales to > parallel servers just fine. > > Is OrecX really $199 per recorded channel? So that 300 channels you're > talking about costs $60,000? So I can buy six $10,000 servers, each of > which can run circles around my current solution, and still break > even. I like my solution better. > > OrecX has a free version. I guess you didin't really check it out since your mind was already made up.
300+ Simultaneous calls recorded in perfect clarity for the price of an R200 or if you want higher end, a DL360 Thanks, Steve Totaro
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
