Paul, He already said, "While am aware and active user of astersk monitor function for recording" so I don't think migration path is an issue.
A dedicated recording server is recommended if you are going to be recording a good deal of calls. You certainly would not want to run out of hard drive space on your Asterisk server and bring it down. Also, with Asterisk (last I knew) ~60 simultaneous calls, the audio starts breaking up very badly due to I/O. OrecX can do over 300 simultaneous calls and only need port mirroring enabled on your switch. Even if it crashes or HD fills, call go on normally. I have coined the term "Passive Recording" since the recording process does not touch Asterisk in any way, shape, or form. Senior Systems and Network Administrator Triple Canopy, Inc., 2250 Corporate Park Drive, Suite 300 ph. +1.703.673.5191 mob.+1.240.938.1212 FAX.+1.703.673.1279 [email protected] On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Paul Hales <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have also seen: > > PSTN ---- asterisk ---- legacy > > Which also gives you a migration path.... > > PaulH > > > Research wrote: > > Hello team; > > While am aware and active user of astersk monitor function for > > recording, i would like to know if i can use asterisk as a pure > > recording server(like nice or witness) for some other PABX's > > extensions (both inbound, outbound and internal). > > > > Setup > > PSTN---Legacy PABX(with analogy n digital extensions)--- > > asterisk(record Legacy PABX extensions.) > > > > Sam > >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
