On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:44:48AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:47:02AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > Is that true for *all* makes of card? I know the Sangomas put it in > > > ifconfig, but for pick-it-off-with-SNMP-for-Nagios purposes, that will > > > make my life a lot easier... > > > > I don't really think Sangoma can put this in ifconfig for analog ports. > > Unless they have a network interface per port. > > Well, from some inspection on some of my own boxen later, RED applies > to the spans, not the channels... at least on T-1 cards, and yes, it's > available on both.
RED applies to ports, not to spans. Or rather, it applies to certain types of communication lines and the use of it to analog lines is just a logical extension. Zaptel terminology of spans has originated from cards in which each span represents a port. In the analog card in which that applied (the X100P) a disconnected cable generated a red alarm for as long as I remember (read: since at least zaptel 1.0). > > I'm not *entirely* happy with the way the Zaptel driver writers > structured the /proc/zaptel 'directory'; I'm going to have to do more > userspace parsing than I'd like to make use of it, but at least it's > there; thanks for the pointer. Is /proc the right place? Or /sys ? Also look at http://bugs.digium.com/12406 (Unfortunetly the submitter has not done a good job at separating different parts of his patch nd thus you'll have to review ztdynamic code changes as well) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
