Yeah, I thought you were talking about PRI on E1 :) Martin
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote: > I think you have something backwards. PRI on E1 is great - 100% standard > throughout the world, apart from some very old leftovers. Its the CAS > stuff which needs endless new state machines. They really do need state > machines. Write them in C, or do as we did (draw them graphically in > Autocad, and compile them directly down to ROM tables). Either way you > build a state machine. > > Regards, > Steve > > > Martin Pycko wrote: > > >Maybe if they'd write the PRI stack in C instead of making a state machine > >they woun'd need to make adjustments so often. > > > >regards > >Martin > > > >On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote: > > > > > > > >>Do people actually do the *ANI*DNIS* thing on E1s? I've never seen that. > >>E1s are a real pain for anything but PRI or SS7. There is so little > >>standardisation. A place I used to work has a substantial team turning > >>out new signalling protocol state machines for each customer of its E1 > >>muxes. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Steve > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
