I didn't mean mp3 or ogg for playback, but emailed voicemail files. The original wav paths could be could be dumped into a low priority encoding queue (for that matter any additional conversion could be done in this fashion).
By the way do all holded channels hear the same signal? John > Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of > course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use > mpg123). The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in decode) > and isn't really appropriate due to its large frame size and high bit rate > for telephony. > > Mark > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, John Harragin wrote: > > > Just out of curiosity, has anyone been working on adding ogg or mp3 encoding > > to voicemail? Lame sounds quite good at low bit rates. Anyway, either of > > these would probably be good for the email message distribution. > > > > John > > > > >> It appears that the pharsing for the wav49 extension which is .WAV isn't > > >> correct in app_voicemail.c. I can't attach the wav49 format although gsm > > and > > >> wav work fine. > > > > >What about just putting "WAV" instead of wav49? > > > > > > > > This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD Antivirus. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD Antivirus. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
