On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:06:19AM -0600, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Eliel Sardanons wrote:
> > We could start a janitor for creating a 'foo reload' and we could make
> > de 'module reload *.so' do a module unload; module load
>
> I would rather not change the behavior of "module reload". I think that would
> be much worse than just removing it, as it changes behavior that has existed
> for
> years. Running "module unload / module load" isn't that bad.
What's so bad about having some syntactic sugar? And actually having
some stable CLI between two releases?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
