On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:26:34 Eliel Sardanons wrote: > On 11/27/07, Russell Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eliel Sardanons wrote: > > > We could start a janitor for creating a 'foo reload' and we could make > > > de 'module reload *.so' do a module unload; module load > > > > I would rather not change the behavior of "module reload". I think that > > would be much worse than just removing it, as it changes behavior that > > has existed for years. Running "module unload / module load" isn't that > > bad. > > So: > - Start a janitor to implement 'foo reload' for every module that does > something in the reload() handler function. > - Deprecate CLI command 'module reload <modulename>' > - Remove the 'reload()' handler function on every module.
I wouldn't do this last one. That is the handler that is called when we do a generic 'reload', for every single module. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
