On Thursday 28 December 2006 03:33, Tony Mountifield wrote: > Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 07:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Some of my suggestions are also in the waiting queue that can be seen > > > in the bug/feature request tracker. > > > > It is a bugtracker only. Feature requests properly belong on the Wiki, > > not on the bugtracker. > > Despite the bug tracker having a project called "Feature Requests" and a > report severity called "feature"?
It formerly did track Feature Requests, but we usually only permit those to remain open for a few days. If there is no prospective patch, then the bug is set to Suspended state and closed (to be reopened when a prospective patch is uploaded to the bug). Features with patches, however, do properly exist in the bugtracker, as they are prospective additions, not pie-in-the-sky proposals for new functionality. Proposals for new functionality (without patches) are properly discussed on this list. That is the only way to ensure that all developers have a chance to notice and contribute to the discussion. It is otherwise very easy to miss a discussion on the bugtracker. > If this policy has changed (and I'm not at all convinced it should), then > the guidelines ought to reflect this. I'm sure someone will find the time at some point to revise the text. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
