> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:34 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [asterisk-dev] Re: Improvement of coding practices > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 07:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Some of my suggestions are also in the waiting queue that can be seen > in > > > the bug/feature request tracker. > > > > It is a bugtracker only. Feature requests properly belong on the Wiki, > not on > > the bugtracker. > > Despite the bug tracker having a project called "Feature Requests" and a > report severity called "feature"? > > Also, in the bug guidelines, under "So, what is the purpose of the > bugtracker?", it says "The secondary use is to track feature requests, > which are not as critical as bugs and which will receive second priority > in all cases." > > If this policy has changed (and I'm not at all convinced it should), then > the guidelines ought to reflect this. >
I am 100% against changing that policy if anyone is thinking of doing so. The best way to see, test, document and discuss new features is in the tracker. Removing new feature requests/features from this system would put an artificial limit on the community. -Jonathan _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
