Derek Smithies wrote:
If he is still developing, but not sold product, then fine. There is no GPL violation.
Um, no.
Whether has sold anything or not is not a criteria for whether he has met the obligations he agreed to. He has distributed a derivative product (the setup executable), and by doing so, has agreed to the terms of the GPL.
One of those terms is to produce all the files, original and modified, which comprise the source of the binary he distributed.
You see, suppose he has been required to write Makefiles and configure commands to get it to work (but not changed the asterisk source) he is not required to release.
He has already indicated on the web page that someone will need both the original unmodified Asterisk source as well as a set of patches to this tree in order to create what he has distributed.
-Johnathan _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
