On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:49:51PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > | What I proposed to the OP was that he produce a sample conversion of > one of the > | more complicated modules (chan_sip) so that everyone can see what the > | actual code would look like, rather than trying to get assent/approval > | for something that hasn't been seen yet. > > I agree. This is the only way that this will ever happen. A module (I > second the reccomendation for chan_sip) needs to be converted and placed > on the bug tracker. I haven't really heard a convincing argument for > keeping the macros so I'd like to see this discussion continued there so > a decision can be made.
If anybody's looking for a project, I know that chan_zap.c has a lot of fields that could be converted over to using int variable_name:1 style flags. I've thought a few times about doing it, but just haven't had time to yet. It also might be a little less of a moving target than chan_sip.c to work on. Matthew Fredrickson _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
