-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
| What I proposed to the OP was that he produce a sample conversion of one of the | more complicated modules (chan_sip) so that everyone can see what the | actual code would look like, rather than trying to get assent/approval | for something that hasn't been seen yet.
I agree. This is the only way that this will ever happen. A module (I second the reccomendation for chan_sip) needs to be converted and placed on the bug tracker. I haven't really heard a convincing argument for keeping the macros so I'd like to see this discussion continued there so a decision can be made.
Russell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB8AtfrwroOS5t/FoRAohfAJ9VfaQEZpR2AFl5o+o1AC9QN4XQvACfVA1H 2ka6WXYSGp/+SzszojthRzg= =vl68 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
