Stock Kernel? Are you referring to Linux or Asterisk. Both can be fixed.
45 Mbps in, 64 Mbps out. Not difficult If Linux can't do it, then fix it. If Asterisk can't do it, then I will fix it. Race "The Tyrant" Vanderdecken -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Svensson Sent: 18 November 2004 16:08 To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Is there a need for a DS3 channel/driver? On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mike M wrote: > > > Sometimes in the so-called unchannelized streams you are informed of > > where the frame boundry is in the bitstream. With that information one > > can create soft-channelization. Perhaps this is unreasonable for a DS3 > > however. > Given that its a tough problem to drive current generation of quad-T1 > cards without frame slips, I think doing soft-ds3 stuff is crazy. It could > be possible given enough buffers...But I think its crazy ;) I thought the consensus was that the current problems are that the stock kernel has a hard time guaranteeing interrupt latencies well below 1ms. The actual cpu utilization seems not to be too bad. It would be a neat trick. Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
