On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:49:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mike M wrote: > > > Sometimes in the so-called unchannelized streams you are informed of > > where the frame boundry is in the bitstream. With that information one > > can create soft-channelization. Perhaps this is unreasonable for a DS3 > > however. > Given that its a tough problem to drive current generation of quad-T1 > cards without frame slips, I think doing soft-ds3 stuff is crazy. It could > be possible given enough buffers...But I think its crazy ;)
By frames slips do you mean that channels get rotated, for example, channel 0 shows up where you expect channel 2? Sounds like a driver issue. What little I know about Asterisk and what I know about soft-channeling leads me to agree: crazy. Besides, until all the TNTs and similar equipment are flushed out of eBay there's better alternatives. -- Michael Mueller _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
