I'm sorry, I don't follow what you wrote.

If Net:SSLeay uses it's own DLL's independent from OpenSSL's exe/dll, why
does OpenSSL exe's need to be installed on the machine?

If I'm not understanding and OpenSSL exe's DO need to be installed, OpenSSL
version do you suggest I install and from where?  Shining light?

Or do I need to make/compile myself?  (hope not)

Thanks, and sorry for the bother!

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Thomas Eckardt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> >OpenSSL-lib  1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 1.0.1l   / 1.0.1h
>
> This is the openssl version Net::SSLeay is compiled with (against).
> Net::SSLeay generates static libraries (dll). So it is running independend
> from the installed openssl binary version on windows.
>
> The startuplog shows something like:
>
> Jan-13-16 08:21:27 [init] The underlying SSL library Net::SSLeay version
> 1.72 uses OpenSSL 1.0.2c 12 Jun 2015
>
> >I have NOT installed OpenSSL exe's.
>
> This is a fault.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:    K Post <[email protected]>
> An:     ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]>
> Datum:  14.01.2016 00:25
> Betreff:        [Assp-test] OpenSSL
>
>
>
> Just upgraded to 16013 on WINDOWS.  Thanks for the continuous updates and
> fixes.
>
>  I updated all perl modules that I could through PPM and the rest from
> CPAN
> (buy unzipping)  All seems well, however the info screen shows:
>
> OpenSSL-lib  1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 1.0.1l   / 1.0.1h
>
> I had asked about something similar back in June, but that conversation
> kind of fizzled out.  I have NOT installed OpenSSL exe's.
>
> Questions:
> 1) It appears that I'm already running 1.0.1 L, which I presume to be
> newer
> than the H version.  Is that a problem?
> 2) The link to the right points to the OpenSSL page.  I don't know what
> modules / files that I need to update if I wanted to downgrade to h or
> upgrade to the newer 1.0.2 versions
>       2a what version is recommenced?
>
> THANK YOU.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to