"IBM Mainframe Assembler List" <[email protected]> wrote on
03/15/2023 12:56:49 PM:
> > But in this case, Peter, I'd argue that since it's an assembler
statement
> > that controls the result, it's not *incorrect* here. And there is no
BINDER
> > list.
>
> A fortuitous accident: a non-assembler had an assembler answer.
Yep, the linker/loader/binder did it but an assembler statement
change "fixed" it. Interestingly enough, a linker/loader/binder ENTRY
statement would have fixed it, too.
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
--
int.ext: 91078
direct: (937) 531-6378
home: (937) 751-3300
Winsupply Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
*********************************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or proprietary
information. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the message and all
copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or disclosure of this
message is strictly prohibited. No right to confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any error in transmission.
*********************************************************************************************