Hi, The Rejection is show, but sadly, not the reason. We don't use any of the 
classic views within our organisation, but it looks very much like the same 
information is presented. Thanks for the pointer anyway - I'll keep digging.  I 
did/have raise a ticket with BMC, however the response I got was along the 
lines of "please details exactly the steps used to reject the change", which 
made me bang my head on the table numerous times. Cheers -MikeDate: Wed, 5 Dec 
2012 09:56:40 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Rejection of Changes and reason why
To: [email protected]

**
Michael, the comments would be stored as part of the Approval Signature record, 
not the Change itself.  If you go to the Approvals tab (Classic view) and look 
at the Rejected approvals there, do the comments appear on the Signature record 
available in that table?



Rick


On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Michael Burton <[email protected]> 
wrote:


**



Hi,
 
Using 7.6.03. 
 
If a user rejects a change via Approval Central and a reason why it was 
rejected is entered in to the Justification For Action field, where would you 
be able to find that information on the associated change?


 
The reason I ask is that we have customers who login to review and then approve 
or reject changes and they are typing feedback in to the Justification For 
Action field. We then see the change has been rejected but are unable to find 
the reason why, so have to ask the customer, which is a tad embarrasing.


 
I would expect it to appear in the Comments field of the Change Signature 
Detail form, but sadly not.
 
Sorry if a dumb/stuipd question.
 
Cheers
 
-
Mike
                                          
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_


_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_                   
                  
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to