Same reason that most all MS products only run on MS OS's. The answer is right under your nose. Don't look too hard or you'll miss it.
Axton The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Joe DeSouza <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > I kind of figured you were joking.. I wonder why they don't make one for > UNIX considering that the SQL server now is not all that quirky as it used > to be.. > > Joe > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Axton <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:52:40 PM > *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue > > ** Nope, just my attempt at humor. > > > Axton > > The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in > this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My > voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a > spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, > Inc. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Joe DeSouza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> If they had one! Do they? I did hear of third party connectors but not >> really of a client written by MS.. >> >> Joe >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Axton <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:21:40 PM >> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >> >> ** Good thing it's not as inefficient as the sql server client for >> unix/linux. >> >> >> Axton Grams >> >> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in >> this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My >> voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a >> spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, >> Inc. >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Joe DeSouza <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> ** >>> I believe the reason is because of the Oracle Client on Windows is not >>> quite as efficient as its UNIX counterpart when it comes to connecting to a >>> Remote Oracle Database. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Anthony K R <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:04:21 PM >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >>> >>> Slow on windows because of Anti-virus scan? >>> >>> >>> >>> -Anthony >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joe DeSouza >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:22 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >>> >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> I have noticed on almost similar configuration (sizewise) that startup >>> times on UNIX is considerably better. I had problems on Windows having >>> similar configurations in terms of memory etc.. >>> >>> >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* Lyle Taylor <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:12:30 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >>> >>> Interesting, I think this is the first time that I’ve heard someone >>> specifically call out Windows as being part of the problem rather than just >>> a remote Oracle database. Your response is actually encouraging, because >>> we’re going to be switching over to Linux with the remote Oracle database. >>> Hopefully we’ll have better luck there… >>> >>> >>> >>> Lyle >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joe DeSouza >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:20 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >>> >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> Its a known issue where ARS on Windows connected to a Remote Oracle >>> database, takes forever to recache and that it takes forever to restart >>> if the services have been stopped and is restarted. This is because of the >>> way that data is read in chunks of 100 rows. It is as designed and Remedy >>> has nothing to do with the design as its more how the Oracle client >>> communicates to remote oracle databases when the client is on Windows.. >>> >>> >>> >>> I didn't experience the kinds of problems you are talking about on UNIX >>> ARS Servers connected to remote Oracle databases. >>> >>> >>> >>> So I guessed your configurations by the symptoms you described. >>> Unfortunately you got to live with it unless you decide to move to UNIX. >>> >>> >>> >>> Joe >>> >> >> __Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" >> html___ >> > > __Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ > > __Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
