In addition, there's no limit as far as AR System is concerned for the number 
of people that you can put in a support group, but you may encounter problems 
with certain ITSM subsystems.  For example, there's a design flaw in the 
Approval engine where it stores a list of everybody in each support group in a 
single field on one of its forms, but that field is only 254 characters long.  
Obviously, it will break that if you have too many people in the group.  If 
you're not using approval for that group, that shouldn't be an issue, though.

Lyle

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ITSM 7.0.3 - Support Group limit

**
To the best of my knowledge there is no such limit. You might only have 
perfornamce problems with too many support groups

Joe

________________________________
From: "Chowdhury, Tauf" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:32:05 PM
Subject: ITSM 7.0.3 - Support Group limit

**
Hi all,
Does someone know the following:

1.       What is the limit of how many support groups can exist under an 
Organization?

2.       What is the limit of how many individuals can be added to a support 
group?

Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.
Analyst, Service Management
Informatics-Infrastructure
Office: 631.858.7765
Mobile:646.483.2779

__Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.



_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to