A better approach is to parse the group list into an external qual.  e.g.,

1;2;3

into

'groupid' = 1 or 'groupid' = 2 or 'groupid' = 3

Axton Grams

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Dwayne Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Wouldn't '$GROUP$ like ("100012;" + "%")' depend on "100012;" being the first 
> group on the list?
>
> How about '$GROUP$ like ("100012;" + "%") or '$GROUP$ like ("%;100012;" + 
> "%")'?
>
> That would still eliminate "1100012".
>
> Dwayne Martin,
> James Madison University
>
> ---- Original message ----
>>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:09:41 -0700
>>From: Joe DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
>>To: [email protected]
>>
>>   **
>>
>>   Depending on how you have structured your Group ID's
>>   you are less likelier to get this error if you base
>>   your search criteria on the Group ID of the group.
>>   It is a good practice therefore to have a good group
>>   ID naming convention wherein a like search for a
>>   group say $GROUP$ like ("100012;" + "%") would not
>>   result in finding another group that has its ID say
>>   1100012. Remember to include the semi colon at the
>>   end of the Group ID as that is how the Group ID's
>>   are separated in the database in the C104 column of
>>   the T table belonging to the User schema..
>>
>>
>>
>>   Take a good look at the contents of the C104 column
>>   in your T table of the User schema to arrive at what
>>   might be the best search for you..
>>
>>
>>
>>   Joe
>>
>>   ----- Original Message ----
>>   From: Robert Molenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>   To: [email protected]
>>   Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:46:07 PM
>>   Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
>>
>>   **
>>   Don't you just have to "love" the LIKE %<Groupname>%
>>   functionality?
>>
>>   That's HD 5x for you... it is because of the LIKE
>>   queries...
>>
>>   To get "around" this in the past we put a
>>   non-descript character in the group name which is
>>   getting 'duplicated' so your your example if you
>>   change "Quest" to "Quest." (with a period) that will
>>   correct (circumvent) the issue although people might
>>   not like it but you get what you got.
>>
>>   HTH
>>   Robert
>>
>>   On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Shane Buchholz
>>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>     **
>>
>>     I ran into an interesting problem today with group
>>     names that are similar.  One group is called
>>     Quest, and another group has the word Request in
>>     it.  Members of the group with Request in the name
>>     are seeing tickets assigned to the group called
>>     Quest without actually being members of the
>>     group.  When I change the group name to have
>>     anything other than just Quest it works
>>     correctly.  Has anyone seen this before, and maybe
>>     know the cause?  I could not find anything on the
>>     Remedy Support site or in the ARList Archives.
>>     Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>     AR System – 6.3
>>     Help Desk – 5.6
>>
>>     Windows 2003 Server SP2
>>     SQL 8.0
>>
>>
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>     Shane Buchholz
>>
>>     Information Security Specialist
>>
>>     Remedy Administrator
>>
>>     Account Services – Information Services
>>
>>
>>
>>     __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist:
>>     "Where the Answers Are" html___
>>
>>   --
>>   If it were not for the gutter, my mind would be
>>   homeless!
>>   __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist:
>>   "Where the Answers Are" html___
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to