That is a really good question.

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of David Sanders
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interview questions

**
So what's wrong with

AND ( 'lesson_status' =  "Completed" ) AND ( 'DB.lesson_status' !=  "Completed" 
)

When do you expect that to fire when you don't want it to??

David Sanders
Remedy Solution Architect
Enterprise Service Suite @ Work
==========================
ARS List Award Winner 2005
Best 3rd party Remedy Application

See the ESS Concepts 
Guide<http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk/downloads/ESS_Concepts_Guide.pdf>

tel +44 1494 468980
mobile +44 7710 377761
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

web http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk<http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk/>

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interview questions

Because an API we have can write to this record multiple times...but we only 
want the workflow to go off the first time lesson_status is changed.

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Thad K Esser
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interview questions
**
How is using 'TR.lesson_status' better than just 'lesson_status'?

Thad Esser
Remedy Developer
Work: 503-220-6192
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there 
is nothing left to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry


"Pargeter, Christie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" <[email protected]>

02/21/2008 01:23 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To

[email protected]

cc



Subject

Re: Interview questions










Here is a piece of workflow that I have in my system today that uses TR and it 
should.

( 'RecordUploadStatus' = "Uploaded") AND ( 'Emp_EntryID' !=  $NULL$ ) AND ( 
'ClassNameID' !=  $NULL$ ) AND ( 'TR.lesson_status' =  "Completed" ) AND ( 
'DB.lesson_status' !=  "Completed" )

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interview questions

I think questions about:

1) Field Ids
2) Workflow naming
3) How do you document what you have done
  (and this is a biggy, the WHY stuff was done is usually left out)

The responses to those 3 open ended questions tell you alot.

I had one senior person tell me recently that he didn't think there was any 
reason to choose your own field ids for a custom module (on a system with the 
ITSM6 suite).

Didn't get a chance to show him how much workflow I had been able to borrow 
from ITSM6 for the custom module by using the same field ids for the standard 
fields and then just copying the workflow with new naming (so changes for the 
ITSM module, or BMC patches would not affect the workflow that I borrowed).

... Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: February 21, 2008 3:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interview questions

Well, I can only speak for myself, but I normally use the TR. prefix, just so 
you can look at the qualification at a glance and understand what it means.  It 
reminds me of C and Java programmers who omit braces when they aren't 
necessary.  Sure, it's legal, but is it more readable?  Too often we forget 
that code may be written once, but read hundreds of times (e.g., by beleaguered 
maintenance programmers at 3:00 AM).

I'd much rather argue over whether you should ever let the admin tool pick your 
field IDs and whether workflow names should be meaningful rather than over 
syntactic sugar.

--Tim

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: 
www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


***IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment, contains 
information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for 
the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. 
Nothing in this email, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally 
binding signature.***
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ 
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to