Well, duh, that worked. Sometimes it's hard to see the simplest solutions.
Thanks, Julie. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julie Rockwood Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PERFORM-ACTION-APPLY Weirdness (UNCLASSIFIED) ** Norm, What happens if you change the order of the active links? Julie At 01:20 PM 11/26/2007, you wrote: >I would avoid the wide open $OPERATION$ != QUERY because it will probably get you into trouble. There are lots of different states associated with the $OPERATION$ keyword. Thanks, but I want the workflow to fire in each of those states *other* than QUERY, so my qualification is fine. Really that's not the issue. The issue, in my mind, is that workflow continues processing despite the mode change...which I suppose isn't wrong, per se, just not what I expect. Perhaps what I need to do is put a hidden display only field on the form that gets set when the operation is begun and prevents the second AL from firing. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
