What's next? RIR competition? :-) On Saturday, February 8, 2014, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm sure it insures something. I'm not sure an accurate registry is what > it insures. > > Owen > > On Feb 7, 2014, at 18:07 , Martin Hannigan > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > wrote: > > > RIPE-605 is now policy in the RIPE region. > > 1. Provides registry services to legacy holders without contractual > requirement > > 2. Excludes legacy holders from RIPE policy purview, past-present-future > > 3. Can revert a legacy block under contract back to a non-contract state > > 4. Reversion concept = "real property" > > This is certainly one way to insure an accurate registry. > > See RIPE-605 here: http://bit.ly/MzbmZ1 > > Best, > > -M< > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > ([email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > ). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>if > you experience any issues. > > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
