Re: [arch-general] Firefox without signature checking

[Dutch Ingraham]

On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 09:01:10PM +0000, Emil Lundberg wrote:
> 
> If that is Mozilla's plan, I will most definitely use or make an
> alternative package. I use Pentadactyl, which is currently unsigned, and I
> will not switch away from it anytime soon. I agree that an alternative
> package would probably belong in the AUR, at least for starters.
> 
> >
As to the future of Pentadactyl:
https://github.com/5digits/dactyl/issues/99