On 04/06/2011 10:34 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Upstream stability makes sense. If redhat is behind cronie, then that
> seems like the logical choice.
Why is this logical? Is it the developer what makes a software good or
is it the features and the stability? If Redhat's cronie has less
features than fcron then fcron is the logical choice, of course.
Heiko,
You are correct. The long term stability was just my thought. Like I said
earlier in my message -- It doesn't matter to me which cron we have -- as long
as we have one that works :) I have no say in the matter, so I will, of
course, defer to whatever decision you guys reach. I just want to make sure we
have a cron by default :)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
