> The only viable solution I could think of is using one git repository > per package - and that is just crazy. > With submodules it wouldn't be that bad.
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ... Dieter Plaetinck
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? Thomas Bächler
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? Dieter Plaetinck
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ... Ray Rashif
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => ... Florian Pritz
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => ... Dieter Plaetinck
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => ... Xavier Chantry
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => ... Dieter Plaetinck
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs =&... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? Muhammed Uluyol
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? fons
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ... Xavier Chantry
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => ... fons
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs =&... Nathan Wayde
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, a... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] svn packagin... Xavier Chantry
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? David C. Rankin
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? Stefan Husmann
- Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs => git ? Dieter Plaetinck
