On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgrif...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+a...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01, Ananda Samaddar >> <ananda.samad...@vfemail.net> wrote: >>> I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian >>> user for nine years. There is something that troubles me though about >>> Arch. Its lack of security focus. >>> >> >> Basically this and everything related to it comes down to manpower. >> Every time it gets brought up, the response is "that would be nice" >> and then no one does anything. If you want to make it happen, then >> work on submitting patches and doing the legwork that needs to be >> done. > > Don't forget: everyone is interested in "starting discussions" or > "planning" or "drawing up plans", but when it comes to the actual work > well, then the original initiators get disinterested. It's as if the > problem is purely academic and all that's needed is a solution and > things will simply get implemented.
How does Arch Linux far behind in security as compared to Debian. Perhaps I caught this conversation late but I would like to know what makes Debian better in aspects of security -vs- Arch? Can anyone please explain?
