> cover the users who USE and EXPECT 'vim' but still type 'vi' (sigh)
couldn't we suggest them to make an alias ?
- [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires inter... Tobias Kieslich
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requi... bs
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing r... Jan de Groot
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing r... Magnus Therning
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testi... Andrei Thorp
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing r... Tobias Kieslich
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requi... Thomas Bohn
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing r... tobias
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testi... Thomas Bohn
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in t... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim... ludovic coues
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim... tobias
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testi... Dan McGee
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in t... André Ramaciotti
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim... Jan de Groot
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/... André Ramaciotti
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/... Frédéric Perrin
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/... André Ramaciotti
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] New vi/... Pierre Chapuis
