On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Thomas Bohn <tho...@bohnomat.de> wrote:
> On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tob...@justdreams.de wrote:
>
>> the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a
>> smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of
>> vim/gvim while vi sits in testing.
>
> I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Both makes it
> complex.
>
>> Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before,

Actually, I don't see a big problem with vim having provides/conflicts
with vi, so that it will completely supplant it. That way we also
cover the users who USE and EXPECT 'vim' but still type 'vi' (sigh)

Reply via email to