Hi Rod, The real purpose is to have a list of UUID and the "source web page" for the data set. Thus, one way to do it is to select those resources that counts <> 0 for PLANTAE *AND* Brazil.
I don't want to do any stats analysis, but feed up one local harverster / agregator. The problem is, considering the reply from Jan Legind at Sep 3, we have to check one by one (https://goo.gl/3wysaA) to check if it is a Herbarium / Preserved Specimen (Plantae) or not, from the request http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/counts/datasets?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN . Does it make sense? Thanks for your curiosity! :) Cheers, Eduardo -------------------------------- *Eduardo Dalcin <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/5516ed5e4f903c6ee9bd9fb3876fb65ffffc687c?url=http%3A%2F%2Feduardo.dalc.in&signature=cda9e9bf584a828c>* Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Bot?nico do Rio de Janeiro - JBRJ e-mail: edalcin at jbrj.gov.br Trabalho / Work: +55 21 3204 2116 -------------------------------- *e-mail alternativo / * *alternate email:** edalcin at jbrj.org <edalcin at jbrj.org>* -------------------------------- Agendar reuni?o / Schedule a meeting: http://agendar.dalc.in <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/3a5eaa1df56016285886497766577e5357ddc6c1?url=http%3A%2F%2Fagendar.dalc.in&signature=c4e8d8113c34937f> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > I?m curious, is the purpose to get counts by dataset by country, or to get > all the plant occurrences for Brazil? The later can be obtained by > downloading all plant occurrences in Brazil > http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?TAXON_KEY=6&COUNTRY=BR (you could > then compute the per-dataset stats locally). I realise that this isn?t as > convenient as having GBIF slice the data for you in the API. > > Regards > > Rod > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Roderic Page > Professor of Taxonomy > Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine > College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences > Graham Kerr Building > University of Glasgow > Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK > > Email: Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk > Tel: +44 141 330 4778 > Skype: rdmpage > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/rdmpage > LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/rdmpage > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage > Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com > ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-9767 > Citations: http://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=4Z5WABAAAAAJ > ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roderic_Page > > > On 4 Sep 2015, at 10:39, Eduardo Dalcin <edalcin at jbrj.org> wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > Yes, that's a shame I can't have country and "nub" together. There is any > hope about it? > > Eduardo > > > -------------------------------- > *Eduardo Dalcin > <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/bac23864202354f3789938ce352a878faa0cd8b8?url=http%3A%2F%2Feduardo.dalc.in&signature=aea58ef6f439535b>* > Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Bot?nico do Rio de Janeiro - JBRJ > e-mail: edalcin at jbrj.gov.br > Trabalho / Work: +55 21 3204 2116 > -------------------------------- > *e-mail alternativo / * *alternate email:** edalcin at jbrj.org > <edalcin at jbrj.org>* > -------------------------------- > Agendar reuni?o / Schedule a meeting: http://agendar.dalc.in > <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/db57b837be515d4b7caefe43d55b60467cd7c2c1?url=http%3A%2F%2Fagendar.dalc.in&signature=69b244942739c0f5> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Markus D?ring <mdoering at gbif.org> wrote: > >> Eduardo, >> >> as you might have seen from my issue comment the webservice uses a >> different parameter name for taxonKey which is a bug we need to fix at some >> point. >> Please use nubKey for now to use the service like that: >> >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/counts/datasets?nubKey=6 >> >> The real problem for you will be that we do not support the combination >> of the country and the taxon filter, just one of the two. So you cannot >> search for plants in Brazil I am afraid, just for datasets about Brazil and >> datasets with plant records. >> >> Markus >> >> >> >> > On 03 Sep 2015, at 14:12, Eduardo Dalcin <edalcin at jbrj.org> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Jan. I'll keep exploring and I'll be in touch, if I need. >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Eduardo >> > >> > >> > >> > -------------------------------- >> > Eduardo Dalcin >> > Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Bot?nico do Rio de Janeiro - JBRJ >> > e-mail: edalcin at jbrj.gov.br >> > Trabalho / Work: +55 21 3204 2116 >> > -------------------------------- >> > e-mail alternativo / alternate email: edalcin at jbrj.org >> > -------------------------------- >> > Agendar reuni?o / Schedule a meeting: http://agendar.dalc.in >> <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/db57b837be515d4b7caefe43d55b60467cd7c2c1?url=http%3A%2F%2Fagendar.dalc.in&signature=69b244942739c0f5> >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Jan Legind [GBIF] <jlegind at gbif.org> >> wrote: >> > Dear Eduardo, >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for getting in touch with us about these issues. >> > >> > >> > >> > The first request >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/count?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN >> returns the number of records located in Brazil for the facets in the >> request. >> > >> > The second query >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/counts/datasets?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN >> uses the Occurrence Inventories web service >> http://www.gbif.org/developer/occurrence#inventories which does not >> support the basis-of-record facet in the /datasets request. I understand >> that it would be better if the API response yielded an error message in >> this instance. >> > >> > >> > >> > Concerning the other issues ? you are indeed right that the counts do >> not make sense in the context of taxon key 6 which is Plantae. Actually the >> API does not handle the taxonKey search at all, contrary to what the >> documentation states: >> > >> > >> > >> > /occurrence/counts/datasets >> > >> > GET >> > >> > Counts >> > >> > Lists occurrence counts for datasets that cover a given taxon or >> country. >> > >> > country, taxonKey >> > >> > >> > >> > As you can see here, >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/counts/datasets?taxonKey=6 , this >> request doesn?t return anything. >> > >> > >> > >> > The GBIF developers will handle this issue in due time. >> > >> > You can follow the issue in our bug tracking service here: >> http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2828 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > With best regards, >> > >> > >> > >> > Jan K. Legind >> > >> > Data manager, GBIF Secretariat >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: API-users [mailto:api-users-bounces at lists.gbif.org] On Behalf Of >> Eduardo Dalcin >> > Sent: 2. september 2015 20:06 >> > To: api-users at lists.gbif.org; dev at gbif.org >> > Cc: Jo?o Monnerat Lanna; Nat?lia Queiroz; Diogo Silva; Laura; Ricardo >> Avancini >> > Subject: [API-users] Some questions from a begginer >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > >> > >> > This is my first message to the list. So, please, be nice :) >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm working here at Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, together with the >> guys at the National Center for Flora Conservation. We are doing the risk >> assessment of the Brazilian flora to the government. We assess, so far, the >> risk of ca. 6.000 species, but we still have to assess ca. 35.000. Access >> occurrence records for Brazil is crucial, and every occurrence is important. >> > >> > >> > >> > That means that we have to put together occurrence data from different >> sources and, after the first batch of the risk assessment, we realize that >> we need to build up our aggregator. We are planning to do this with the >> Lontra-harvester, with the help of the guys at Brazilian GBIF Node. >> > >> > >> > >> > So, the one of the firsts steps was to list the available resources to >> understand the dimension of the task and, that brings me to my questions. >> > >> > >> > >> > First: >> > >> > >> > >> > The request: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/count?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN >> > >> > >> > >> > returns 4.982.689 records >> > >> > >> > >> > And the request: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/counts/datasets?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN >> > >> > >> > >> > returns (here) 7.406.310 records >> > >> > >> > >> > Comments? >> > >> > >> > >> > Second: >> > >> > >> > >> > The request: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/count?country=BR&taxonKey=6&basisOfRecord=PRESERVED_SPECIMEN >> > >> > >> > >> > return things like this: >> > >> > >> > >> > "197908d0-5565-11d8-b290-b8a03c50a862":27629 >> > >> > >> > But the consult of the same dataset: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?TAXON_KEY=6&DATASET_KEY=197908d0-5565-11d8-b290-b8a03c50a862 >> > >> > >> > >> > Returns "null" (of course, is a FishBase!) >> > >> > >> > >> > I have plenty of examples like this, on yellow here (not finished!): >> > >> > >> > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1msUjwMLoKwnXxJFzF20SeN_C65RIkGLbwaYyj459VTc/edit?usp=sharing >> > >> > >> > >> > Comments? >> > >> > >> > >> > I think those two questions is a good start. Please, let me know if I'm >> doing something wrong. >> > >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > >> > >> > Eduardo >> > >> > -------------------------------- >> > >> > Eduardo Dalcin >> > >> > Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Bot?nico do Rio de Janeiro - JBRJ >> > >> > e-mail: edalcin at jbrj.gov.br >> > >> > Trabalho / Work: +55 21 3204 2116 >> > >> > -------------------------------- >> > >> > e-mail alternativo / alternate email: edalcin at jbrj.org >> > >> > -------------------------------- >> > >> > Agendar reuni?o / Schedule a meeting: http://agendar.dalc.in >> <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/db57b837be515d4b7caefe43d55b60467cd7c2c1?url=http%3A%2F%2Fagendar.dalc.in&signature=69b244942739c0f5> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > API-users mailing list > API-users at lists.gbif.org > http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/api-users/attachments/20150909/fc3ed385/attachment-0001.html>
