*"For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow question."* I've already addressed that. That just adds to the reason that you should be patient and wait a little longer. It also does nothing to account for the rude and belligerent behavior.
*"Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me."* Unfortunately you made it sound like you expected that, when you said *"Like, come on, I already showed you the error code. Or is everyone clueless?"* *"You people can blame me for being "impatient", but what good would a solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later?"* We are talking about a period of days, not years. We are simply talking about some basic internet etiquette. *"With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to share anything here."* I highly recommend reading this. The whole article is good, but I'm linking to a very specific section that applies to the interactions in this thread: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#not_losing On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:28 PM Ristar <[email protected]> wrote: > For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried > searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow > question. Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work > for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me. > > You people can blame me for being "impatient", but what good would a > solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later? > > With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to > share anything here. > > > On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:28:46 PM UTC+8, Steve Gabrilowitz wrote: > >> Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and >> impatient. When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who >> knows the answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the >> solution for you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve >> the problem yourself then you will post the solution for the benefit of >> others, but apparently you didn't know that either. >> > >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ristar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's >>> clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only >>> asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same >>> question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. >>> >>> I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than >>> all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about "rudeness" >>> because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but >>> derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the >>> solution to the problem. >>> >>> If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: >>>> >>>> *"If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you >>>> stop reading."* >>>> I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called >>>> out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if >>>> you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. >>>> >>>> *"In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop >>>> surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities."* >>>> Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out >>>> on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. >>>> >>>> *"I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread."* >>>> The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and >>>> how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your >>>> rudeness. >>>> >>>> *"As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on >>>> Stack Overflow."* >>>> What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem >>>> is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, >>>> which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. >>>> >>>> I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really >>>> matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when >>>> they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said >>>> before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able >>>> to answer a question. >>>> >>>> Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I >>>> would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple >>>> question like "Has anyone seen anything like this before?" should suffice. >>>> >>>> *"I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread."* >>>> Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only >>>> person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop >>>>> reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop >>>>> surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not >>>>> appreciate your derailing of the thread. >>>>> >>>>> As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on >>>>> Stack Overflow. >>>>> >>>>> Don't be a derailing troll. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was >>>>>> asked. And yes, your second post was rude. >>>>>> >>>>>> This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare >>>>>> time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for >>>>>> that >>>>>> matter) to answer questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before >>>>>> being answered. >>>>>> >>>>>> So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being >>>>>> rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to >>>>>> help. >>>>>> >>>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
