For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow question. Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me.
You people can blame me for being "impatient", but what good would a solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later? With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to share anything here. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:28:46 PM UTC+8, Steve Gabrilowitz wrote: > > Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and impatient. > When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who knows the > answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the solution for > you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve the problem > yourself then you will post the solution for the benefit of others, but > apparently you didn't know that either. > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ristar <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. >> In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that >> were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack >> Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. >> >> I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all >> the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about "rudeness" >> because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but >> derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the >> solution to the problem. >> >> If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. >> >> >> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: >>> >>> *"If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop >>> reading."* >>> I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out >>> on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you >>> really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. >>> >>> *"In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing >>> the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities."* >>> Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on >>> your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. >>> >>> *"I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread."* >>> The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and >>> how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your >>> rudeness. >>> >>> *"As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on >>> Stack Overflow."* >>> What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is >>> a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which >>> in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. >>> >>> I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter >>> other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are >>> patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it >>> is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a >>> question. >>> >>> Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would >>> suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question >>> like "Has anyone seen anything like this before?" should suffice. >>> >>> *"I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread."* >>> Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only >>> person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop >>>> reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop >>>> surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not >>>> appreciate your derailing of the thread. >>>> >>>> As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack >>>> Overflow. >>>> >>>> Don't be a derailing troll. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was >>>>> asked. And yes, your second post was rude. >>>>> >>>>> This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. >>>>> They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that >>>>> matter) to answer questions. >>>>> >>>>> It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before >>>>> being answered. >>>>> >>>>> So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being >>>>> rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to >>>>> help. >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
